Commentators sometimes call today's passage the "little Apocalypse." This name is clearly connected with the fact that Jesus' account here of the end times recalls some descriptions of the "great Apocalypse," the Book of Revelation of John. And still, the differences between them are no fewer than the similarities...
Commentators sometimes call today's passage the "little Apocalypse." This name is clearly connected with the fact that Jesus' account here of the end times recalls some descriptions of the "great Apocalypse," the Book of Revelation of John. And still, the differences between them are no fewer than the similarities. The chief difference is that Jesus tells His disciples about events that will occur during the lifetime of the first generation of Christians. The only exception is the conclusion of the account, which describes Christ's return in glory, verses 29-31. Jesus, as we see, connects it with the events of 70 AD, when, as a result of the anti-Roman uprising raised by the Zealots, Jerusalem was destroyed by the Romans after a long siege, and Jews were forbidden to settle in Judea, verse 15. By the "abomination of desolation" spoken of in the Book of Daniel, Jesus clearly means the desecration and destruction of the Temple by Roman soldiers when they took the city.
However, as the eyewitness to these events, the historian Flavius Josephus, reports, Christians and Pharisees left the city before the siege began, and the Christians, as we see, were in this case following a direct instruction from their Teacher, verses 16-20. Those who remained in the city, judging by the testimony of the same Flavius Josephus, really did suffer the terrible disasters about which Jesus had warned His disciples, verse 21. The uprising was preceded by a period of feverishly intense messianic expectations, when claimants to messiahship appeared literally every day. It is no accident that Jesus found it necessary to warn the disciples against being carried away by such false messiahs, verses 23-25. But the good news of the true Messiah had been heard throughout the Roman Empire even before 70 AD, verse 14.
Here a natural question arises: if Jesus' account concerns events that took place in the first decades of Christian history, how should we understand His words about the end of history, which was to come after those events? Jesus' account was so well known to the first generation of Christians that those who survived the catastrophe of 70 AD were in complete bewilderment: everything predicted by the Teacher had come true, and still He was not returning. Meanwhile Jesus Himself said nothing about dates: He only pointed to the events of 70 AD as the end of earthly history. Everything further evidently unfolds as part of some other process, no longer defined by this history.
Another history begins: the history of the Kingdom entering the world. It is a history in which each of us will have to take part in one way or another. And exactly what that participation will be depends only on us.
