Jesus' attitude toward fornication and adultery is the same as toward murder: if He equates hatred with murder, then He equates lust with adultery. As we can see, the reasons and logic here are the same: intention in this case too turns out...
Jesus' attitude toward fornication and adultery is the same as toward murder: if He equates hatred with murder, then He equates lust with adultery. As we can see, the reasons and logic here are the same: intention in this case too turns out to be even more important for the Kingdom than the act itself. And just as in the case of hatred, Jesus proposes a kind of 'work in advance': this, apparently, is how His words about the hand that causes stumbling and the eye that causes stumbling should be understood. Just as it is better to be reconciled with an opponent on the way to court than to inflame passions, so it is better simply not to let things reach the point of lust.
Of course, before us here is the development of a tradition that already existed in those days, based on the understanding that passion is easier to prevent than to fight afterward. It is enough to recall the words, well known to everyone then, of one of the great teachers of the Torah, Hillel, who said: passion first looks into your house like a passerby, then enters it like a guest, and in the end settles in it like the master. It was impossible to acquire the inner Torah without special work aimed at preventing sinful passions and intentions from appearing.
But the matter was not only the acquisition of the inner Torah: it too served only as a means for full life in the Kingdom. And for the Kingdom, where the quality of relationships determines everything, the prevention of sinful passions and intentions is extremely important. Of course, if we speak of the Kingdom revealed in all its fullness, then the problem of sinful intentions will no longer exist in it: for the human nature of its inhabitants will also be fully transformed, so that nothing sinful will have any place in their life.
But on the path toward the fullness of the Kingdom and the fullness of transformation, the problem remains, and Jesus reminds us of what can help solve it. He sets the spiritual bar as high as possible: for example, the prohibition of divorce, about which He speaks quite unambiguously, presupposes a quality of relationship unthinkable in our still untransformed world. Of course, the Savior understands perfectly that the right to divorce given to a person by the Torah is a concession to human sinfulness, capable of giving an extra pretext for the very sinful intentions that must be fought. And He does not want to leave His followers such a loophole. For in the Kingdom there are no trifles, and compromises are impossible here.