NOTES for Hos 11:9
How does God's response differ from a human response? Above all, it is precisely this: when He acts in a concrete situation shaped by human sinfulness, He never makes spontaneous decisions. Of course, reading about God's wrath can seem strange to a person with a purely spiritualist mindset.
Indeed, are all human emotions really characteristic of God? Still, we should not forget that behind human emotions there often stands a very concrete attitude toward one person or another, toward one event or another, a concrete and often fully conscious intention. And attitudes and intentions, unlike emotions, are characteristic not only of human beings but also of God, as they are characteristic of every person. Then God's wrath becomes quite understandable: plainly, what is being described is something that would make a human being angry if he could see the situation through God's eyes and evaluate it as God evaluates it. But then the differences begin, because unlike God, who restrains His wrath, fallen human beings often find it very difficult to restrain theirs. Why is that? Is it only because human beings do not know how to control their own emotions? Not only that.
The issue is also the fallen person's attitude toward the concrete situation and toward the people involved in it. Plainly, the fallen person's response to a situation is precisely a reaction, spontaneous and immediate. A person usually sees only the nearest prospect, the nearest consequences of the situation that has developed, and evaluates chiefly or exclusively those. God looks at the matter differently: He sees not only the whole prospect connected with the situation that has developed, from the nearest to the most distant, but also the potentials connected with it, above all the spiritual potentials.
He sees every possibility, even the most unlikely, of a good resolution and a way out of the difficult situation, and He is ready to use them. And of course, unlike a human being, He is not going to apply sanctions to those who have done wrong for the sake of sanctions, or punish for the sake of punishment itself, even if the punishment consists only in letting those who sinned feel the consequences of the sin they committed.
If God does something of the sort, it is only when He knows that it will later make it possible to put into action one of the possibilities He sees for escaping the difficult situation into which His people have driven themselves by their sins. And as for breaking the alliance-covenant once made, that is out of the question: even if only a remnant of the faithful remains from the people, God will preserve faithfulness to the covenant even for the sake of that remnant. In fact, this view and this attitude are what Hosea calls mercy. It is the mercy on which the people can only hope after all the sins they have committed.