It is obvious that an unambiguous, uniquely correct answer to such a question likely cannot be given. Nevertheless… Undoubtedly, the tree of the knowledge of good and evil planted in the garden of Eden, the eating of whose fruit is forbidden, becomes a subject of testing for man. But it is worth looking at this narrative in its context...
It is obvious that an unambiguous, uniquely correct answer to such a question likely cannot be given. Nevertheless…
Undoubtedly, the tree of the knowledge of good and evil planted in the garden of Eden, the eating of whose fruit is forbidden, becomes a subject of testing for man. But it is worth looking at this narrative in its context. The second biblical account of the creation of man (and the narrative of the fall continues exactly this one) speaks of the meaning of human existence, intentionally digressing from the chronology of events. Therefore, we can think that the sacred writer is speaking about man in general, about each of us. And, consequently, to each (and not only to the first) man the commandment is given not to eat of the fruit of this tree. The key word for understanding this narrative is freedom. It is about man being given a real choice: to trust that God is right (and not eat from this tree) or not to trust, and, accordingly, to break the commandment.
If this tree were not there… The subjunctive mood is probably inappropriate here: the biblical narrative does not speak of what could or could not have been, but simply depicts the fact of the establishment of man's spiritual freedom by the means inherent to it. There is the will of the Creator concerning how man should live so that our life may be filled with eternal fullness and meaning. This design implies that we accept the moral world order (the "scale" of good and evil) as God established it, without trying to redefine it (to "master" or "know" it in the language of the sacred writer). The design implies that we choose this freely, out of love for God, and not as programmed automatons. This personal freedom is an incredible (incomprehensible even to the sacred writer) gift of the Creator to man, constituting the essence of our likeness to God. If there is no freedom, then we are no different from the apes, from which, it seems, the Creator "manufactured" our body.
The biblical narrative thus says that God, having created man, placed him in extreme closeness to Himself, so that even power over good and evil, over what is considered good and bad, what ought and ought not to be, is accessible to us. "You have made him a little lower than the heavenly beings…" ( 8:6), as Scripture says. The acceptance of God's statutes regarding good and evil for man essentially turns out to be the acceptance of God Himself as the Source and Lord of life. In this regard, commentators usually note that the fulfillment of the commandment "you shall not eat of it…" requires faith, that is, trust that God is good and desires our good. Therefore, the planting of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil puts us in a situation where we need to believe or not believe. Without this it would be very easy for us, but we would not be like God, that is, we would not be free persons if the possibility of not believing were not real.
Finally, many commentators draw attention to the fact that the command "not to eat of the tree…" is the first (and at that moment the only and all-encompassing) commandment of the Creator to man. This is His Word to us, calling for a dialogue. Speaking about how we answer this call, the sacred writer simply states a sad fact…
I will add to all this one more important aspect. Strictly speaking, the situation described in the 2nd chapter of the book of Genesis implies not so much the choice to "eat or not to eat," but the choice between the tree of power over the world order, and the Tree of Life. According to the generally accepted interpretation of the majority of the Church Fathers and authoritative church thinkers, the Tree of Life is a symbol of the Son of God Himself. However, it is also often seen as a symbol of the Tree of the Cross, on which God, out of love, gives us His life without reserve.
2 This chapter is an appendix to the history of the creation, explaining, and enlarging on that part of it, which relates immediately to man.We have in it,
2:4 In these verses, 1. Here is a name given to the Creator, which we have not yet met with, Jehovah. The LORD in capital letters, is constantly used in our English translation, for Jehovah.This is that great and incommunicable name of God, which speaks his having his being of himself, and his giving being to all things. It properly means, He that was, and that is, and that is to come. 2. Further notice taken of the production of plants and herbs, because they were made to be food for man. 3. A more particular account of the creation of man, Gen 2:7. Man is a little world, consisting of heaven and earth, soul andbody. Here we have all account of the original of both, and the putting of both together: The Lord God, the great fountain of being and power, formed man. Of the other creatures it is said, they were created and made; but of man, that he was formed, which notes a gradual process in the work with great accuracy and exactness. To express the creation of this new thing, he takes a new word: a word (some think) borrowed from the potter's forming his vessel upon the wheel. The body of man is curiously wrought. And the soul takes its rise from the breath of heaven. It came immediately from God; he gave it to be put into the body, Ecc 12:7 as afterwards he gave the tables of stone of his own writing to be put into theark. 'Tis by it that man is a living soul, that is, a living man.The body would be a worthless, useless carcase, if the soul did not animate it.See note at Gen 2:4
2:8 Man consisting of body and soul, abody made out of the earth, and a rational immortal soul, we have in these verses the provision that was made for the happiness of both. That part of man, which is allied to the world of sense, was made happy, for he was put in the paradise of God; that part which is allied to the world of spirits was well provided for, for he was taken into covenant with God. Here we have,
- A description of the garden of Eden, which was intended for thepalace of this prince. The inspired penman in this history writing for the Jews first, and calculating his narratives from the infant state of the church, describes things by their outward sensible appearances, and leaves us, by farther discoveries of the divine light, to be led into the understanding of the mysteries couched under them. Therefore he doth not so much insist upon the happiness of Adam's mind, as upon that of his outward estate. The Mosaic history, as well as the Mosaic law, has rather the patterns of heavenly things, than the heavenly things themselves, Heb 9:23.Observe, (1.) The place appointed for Adam's residence was a garden; not an ivory house. As clothes came in with sin, so did houses. The heaven was the roof of Adam's house, and never was any roof so curiously cieled and painted: the earth was his floor, and never was any floor so richly inlaid: the shadow of the trees was his retirement, and never were any rooms so finely hung: Solomon's in all their glory were not arrayed like them. (2.) The contrivance and furniture of this garden was the immediate work of God's wisdom and power.The Lord God planted this garden, that is, he had planted it, upon the third day when the fruits of the earth were made. We may well suppose it to be the most accomplished place that ever the sun saw, when the All - sufficient God himself designed it to be the present happiness of hisbeloved creature. (3.) The situation of this garden was extremely sweet; it was in Eden, which signifies delight and pleasure. The place is here particularly pointed out by such marks and bounds as were sufficient when Moses wrote, to specify the place to those who knew that country; but now it seems the curious cannot satisfy themselves concerning it. Let it be our care to make sure a place in the heavenly paradise, and then we need not perplex ourselves with a search after the place of the earthly paradise. (4.) The trees wherewith this garden was planted. [1.] It had all the best and choicest trees in common with the rest of the ground.It was beautified with every tree that was pleasant to the sight - It was enriched with every tree that yielded fruit grateful to the taste, and useful to the body. But, [2.] It had two extraordinary trees peculiar to itself, on earth there were not their like. 1. There was the tree of life in the midst of the garden - Which was not so much a natural means to preserve or prolong life; but was chiefly intended to be a sign to Adam, assuring him of the continuance of life and happiness upon condition of his perseverance in innocency and obedience. 2. There was the tree of the knowledge of good and evil - So called, not because it had any virtue to beget useful knowledge, but because there was an express revelation of the will of God concerning this tree, so that by it he might know good and evil. What is good? It is good not to eat of this tree: what is evil? To eat of this tree. The distinction between all other moral good and evil was written in the heart of man; but this, which resulted from a positive law, was written upon this tree. And in the event it proved to give Adam an experimental knowledge of good by the loss of it, and of evil by the sense of it. (5.) The rivers wherewith this garden was watered, Gen 2:10-14. These four rivers, (or one river branched into four streams) contributed much both to the pleasantness and the fruitfulness of this garden. Hiddekel and Euphrates are rivers of Babylon. Havilah had gold and spices and precious stones; but Eden had that which was infinitely better, the tree of life, and communion with God.
- The command which God gave to man in innocency, and the covenant hethan took him into. Hither we have seen God; man's powerful Creator, and his bountiful benefactor; now he appears as his ruler and lawgiver.
See note at Gen 2:82:16 Thou shall die - That is, thou shalt lose all the happiness thou hast either in possession or prospect; and thou shalt become liable to death, and all the miseries that preface and attend it. This was threatened as the immediate consequence of sin. In the day thou eatest, thou shalt die - Not only thou shalt become mortal, but spiritual death and the forerunners of temporal death shall immediately seize thee.See note at Gen 2:17
2:18 It is not good that man - This man, should be alone - Though there was an upper world of angels, and a lower world of brutes, yet there being none of the same rank of beings with himself, he might be truly said to be alone. And every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air God brought to Adam - Either by the ministry of angels, or by a special instinct that he might name them, and so might give a proof of his knowledge, the names he gave them being expressive of their inmost natures.See note at Gen 2:18
2:21 This was done upon the sixth day, as was also the placing of Adam in paradise, though it be here mentioned after an account of the seventh day's rest: but what was said in general, Gen 1:27, that God made man male and female is more distinctly related here, God caused the sleep to fall on Adam, and made it a deep sleep, that so the opening of his side might be no grievance to him: while he knows no sin, God will take care he shall feel no pain.See note at Gen 2:21
2:23 And Adam said, this is now bone of my bones - Probably it was revealed to Adam in a vision, when he was asleep, that this lovely creature, now presented to him, was a piece of himself and was to be his companion, and the wife of his covenant - In token of his acceptance of her, he gave her a name, not peculiar to her, but common to her sex; she shall be called woman, Isha, a She - man, differing from man in sex only, not in nature; made of man, and joined to man.
2:24 The sabbath and marriage were two ordinances instituted in innocency, the former for the preservation of the church, the latter for the preservation of mankind. It appears by Mat 19:4-5, that it was God himself who said here, a man must leave all his relations to cleave to his wife; but whether he spake it by Moses or by Adam who spake, Gen 2:23 is uncertain: It should seem they are the words of Adam in God's name, laying down this law to all his posterity.The virtue of a divine ordinance, and the bonds of it, are stronger even than those of nature. See how necessary it is that children should take their parents consent with them in their marriage; and how unjust they are to their parents, as well as undutiful, if they marry without it; for they rob them of their right to them, and interest in them, and alienate it to another fraudulently and unnaturally.
2:25 They were both naked, they needed no cloaths for defence against cold or heat, for neither could be injurious to them: they needed none for ornament. Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. Nay, they needed none for decency, they were naked, and had no reason to be ashamed. They knew not what shame was, so the Chaldee reads it. Blushing is now the colour of virtue, but it was not the colour of innocency.