Luke briefly touches on a whole series of events about which the other evangelists, especially Matthew, speak in greater detail. He gives the central place to Peter's confession and to Jesus' account of His approaching death and resurrection. There is a logic to this presentation. First of all, the Savior lets His disciples feel the power of the Kingdom and learn from their own experience how this power acts in the world. And not only them: the miraculous feeding of thousands of people with five loaves and two fish is also possible only in the Kingdom. This is not surprising: when it comes to the Kingdom, it is easier to show than to tell. Meanwhile, even those who had previously taken no interest in Christ's testimony begin to notice it—for example, Herod, who was generally wary of every kind of messianic movement that threatened his power.

This is precisely why, immediately after Peter's confession, Jesus explains to the disciples just how different the messiahship He has brought into the world is. Of course, the apostles fully understood everything Jesus told them only on the day of Pentecost. But it was immediately after Peter's confession that He began speaking to them about His messiahship and His path. It is as though He is trying to make everything clear from the outset, so that His messianic ministry will not become associated in His disciples' minds with traditional popular messianic expectations.

From the very beginning, the Savior does everything possible to help His disciples understand as much as they can of what they will have to understand fully in due time. This is natural: Golgotha lay ahead. The disciples had to be prepared, as far as possible, for what awaited them—and what awaited them was the shock of the complete collapse of their entire worldview and sense of the world. Only the experience of the Kingdom could help them endure it—not the earthly kingdom of popular expectations, but the true Kingdom, the one the Savior brought into the world.

The apostles gained as much experience of the Kingdom as was then possible after they went out to preach on their own, without their Teacher. The new ideas about the Kingdom proved more difficult: they would not fit into the disciples' minds or find room in their consciousness. All that remained was to rely on their intuition and, above all, on the personal relationship that bound them to Jesus. Nevertheless, He tells the apostles everything that can be said in human words about His earthly path and earthly ministry. And then each one takes in as much of His words as he is able to take in.

Today's reading offers us several events that Luke links together, making them links in one chain. The passage begins with a description of how Jesus sends the twelve apostles out to preach (vv. 1-10), continues with the story of the miraculous multiplication of the loaves (vv. 11-17), and ends with the account of Peter's confession, including Jesus' conversation (vv. 18-27). And this connection is, of course, not accidental. Jesus sends His disciples to witness to the Kingdom, and to witness not only by word but also by deed, so that the witness would be supported by such a visible manifestation of the Kingdom as healings (vv. 1-2). And the apostles' preaching, as we see, had success, attracting the attention not only of the people but also of the authorities (vv. 7-9).

Then something happened that perhaps even the apostles did not expect. The miracle of the multiplication of the loaves was, as we see, a surprise even for them. In order to feed the gathered people, they were ready to act by the most ordinary methods (vv. 12-13), but Jesus expected something different from them: He told them to behave as if they were in the Kingdom (vv. 14-16). And then something really happened that could not happen according to the laws of our world, not yet transformed, but that is possible in the Kingdom: a small amount of food was enough for everyone, and more than enough, so that if even more people had gathered, there would have been enough for each one (v. 17).

This was a very important experience of the Kingdom for everyone, and above all, of course, for the apostles themselves. Until now they had been witnesses of how the power of the Kingdom acts in a world not yet transformed, a world where its action manifests itself, in one way or another, in opposition to the evil in which this world remains. Now the apostles saw the Kingdom from within, as it will be when the world is completely transformed and renewed. Such an experience of abiding in the triumphant Kingdom could not pass without a trace, and Peter's confession may have become its result (vv. 18-20).

Then Jesus warns His disciples that before the victory of the Kingdom, which they had already partly had occasion to see, becomes complete, He Himself will have to pass through the cross, and those who follow Him will have to share that cross with Him (vv. 21-27). Thus, by giving His disciples a share in the Kingdom, Jesus at the same time tells them about the price of the Kingdom. About the price of the world's transformation and its deliverance from the evil into which the fall plunged it.

As we can see, the preaching of Jesus Himself and of His disciples causes fear and bewilderment among the authorities, first of all in Herod. In principle, there is nothing surprising in this: the authorities, both local and Roman in the person of their representatives in Palestine, were generally wary in those days of all kinds of religious and religious-political movements in Palestine in general and in Judea in particular. They watched especially closely any movement, even one only beginning to emerge, in which there was the slightest hint of messianism. That is not surprising either: popular messianic ideas in those days would inevitably have transformed any messianic movement into an uprising directed both against Rome and against its local appointees, such as Herod, who had the status of a Roman ally. In this case, alliance was the historically formed shape of a more or less honorable vassalage. But Herod's fear, apparently, was not caused only by these quite rational considerations. His fear appears to have been irrational in the stricter sense.

When Herod heard about Jesus and His preaching, and then about the preaching of the apostles whom He had sent, he began rushing about feverishly, trying to understand what it all meant. Had John risen from the dead? Or had the ancient prophet Elijah come down again from heaven, the one of whom popular traditions said that, after leaving the earth in a heavenly chariot, he would return shortly before the day of the last Judgment and the coming of the Messiah? This was clearly the fear of a corrupt man and a murderer, the fear of a sinner afraid of retribution, whether from God, from the zealot "enthusiasts," or from some other force unknown even to him and therefore still more terrifying.

As we can see, the murder of John the Baptist became the last straw that stirred up in the sinful ruler's soul a real storm of fears and manias that had previously been suppressed. It is no accident that the evangelist mentions that Herod liked to talk with John, even when John was already in prison by Herod's own order. Herod hated John, feared him, and, paradoxically, still, if he did not love him, at least felt drawn to him. Communication with John was necessary for Herod.

Perhaps this contact with a righteous man restrained the powers of darkness already nesting in his heart, just as contact with David restrained them in the soul of another sinful ruler, Saul. And the execution of John, which Herod did not want at all, freed the darkness that nested in Herod's soul from the last barrier that kept it from finally taking possession of the sinful king's heart. So Herod began rushing about, foreseeing the inevitable sorrowful end. An end that came quite soon.