The Lord sends the disciples out on their apostolic mission. He sends them two by two. Why precisely two by two? Theophylact of Ohrid points us to Ecclesiastes: "Two are better than one, because they have a good reward for their labour. For if they fall, one will lift up his companion. But woe to him who is alone when he falls, for he has no one to help him up..."
The Lord sends the disciples out on their apostolic mission. He sends them two by two. Why precisely two by two? Theophylact of Ohrid points us to Ecclesiastes: "Two are better than one, because they have a good reward for their labour. For if they fall, one will lift up his companion. But woe to him who is alone when he falls, for he has no one to help him up" (Eccl. 4:9-10). This point is vital. Two. The words "where two or three are gathered in My name, there am I in their midst" naturally come to mind (Mt. 18:20). They prefigure the Church, the parish, the community. They point to plurality: two, three - as though the first terms of the natural numbers, followed by a comma and ellipsis.
Yet the Lord sends precisely two (He does not say "two or three", but clearly "two"), so this dyad must also correspond to a definite reality in our lives. One possible, non-binding explanation is that it is an image of a person and his spiritual father. This kind of standing before the Lord is often difficult for educated, self-sufficient people. They need fellowship like everyone else, and their self-sufficiency can even help them form a parish or community. Yet the sacrament of confession can become an insurmountable obstacle for them. There a person and his spiritual father stand together before God and discern the paths of Christian endeavour, which must always be shared by the two of them to some degree. If one makes a mistake, the other must view it from outside and point it out in time.
In essence, we pass through this life as people sent by the Lord on an apostolic mission, and someone must be nearby. But, one may object, the apostles went as equals, while there is inequality between a spiritual father and his spiritual child, because the former guides the latter. First, one of each pair of apostles most likely emerged as the elder. Second, this inequality stands beside the words: "Call no man your father on earth, for you have one Father, who is in heaven" (Mt. 23:9). We must accept both truths despite their apparent contradiction.
The earlier words about two or three and today's words about two alone seem to address different spheres of our experience of life in God. These spheres enrich rather than contradict one another: one is the experience of community, the other that of our relationship with a spiritual father. There are also passages in which the Lord calls us to stand before Him alone, and everyone knows them well. This third aspect completes the picture, but it is not our subject now.
Another relatively difficult question is why they had to remain in one house. Theophylact of Ohrid explains: "He commands them to remain in one house, lest people think that they change places for the sake of gluttony, wandering from one household to another." Yet this is only a local historical aspect; there must be another meaning as well. Perhaps it lies in trust in God and in the ability to see His guiding hand behind apparently random events in life. If you have come to a certain house, then the Lord has led you there, and you must be faithful to His Providence. If the Lord has brought you to this church and this parish, then that is what He wanted. When we rush about in search of something better, we end up guided solely by our own will.
6
6:1 Mat 13:54; Luk 4:16.
6:3 Is not this the carpenter? - There can be no doubt, but in his youth he wrought with his supposed father Joseph.
6:5 He could do no miracle there - Not consistently with his wisdom and goodness. It being inconsistent with his wisdom to work them there, where it could not promote his great end; and with his goodness, seeing he well knew his countrymen would reject whatever evidence could be given them. And therefore to have given them more evidence, would only have increased their damnation.
6:6 He marvelled - As man. As he was God, nothing was strange to him.
6:7 Mat 10:1; Luk 9:1.
6:8 He commanded them to take nothing for their journey - That they might be always unincumbered, free, ready for motion. Save a staff only - He that had one might take it; but he that had not was not to provide one, Mat 10:9. Luk 9:3.
6:9 Be shod with sandals - As you usually are. Sandals were pieces of strong leather or wood, tied under the sole of the foot by thongs, something resembling modern clogs. The shoes which they are in St. Matthew forbidden to take, were a kind of short boots, reaching a little above the mid - leg, which were then commonly used in journeys. Our Lord intended by this mission to initiate them into their apostolic work. And it was doubtless an encouragement to them all their life after, to recollect the care which God took of them, when they had left all they had, and went out quite unfurnished for such an expedition. In this view our Lord himself leads them to consider it, Luk 22:35: When I sent you forth without purse or scrip, lacked ye any thing?
6:10 Mat 10:11; Luk 9:4.
6:12 Luk 9:6.
6:13 They anointed with oil many that were sick - Which St. James gives as a general direction, Jam 5:14-15, adding those peremptory words, And the Lord shall heal him - He shall be restored to health: not by the natural efficacy of the oil, but by the supernatural blessing of God. And it seems this was the great standing means of healing, desperate diseases in the Christian Church, long before extreme unction was used or heard of, which bears scarce any resemblance to it; the former being used only as a means of health; the latter only when life is despaired of.