24 For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you, as it is written. |
How should we understand Paul's words about God's name being blasphemed among the Gentiles because of the unworthy behavior of those who consider themselves believers? The simplest and clearest answer is known to everyone and needs no comment. It is clear that, looking at the behavior of believers and comparing it with the declarations of those same believers, people around them draw the corresponding conclusions. Of course, intelligent people in such a case usually understand that in every religious community there can be very different people, and one should judge by the best examples, not by the worst.
But every bad example still becomes a kind of anti-advertisement for the religion and community to which the one showing it belongs. And if Christianity were simply one more new religion, there would perhaps be nothing more to say on this subject. But Christianity is not a new religion; it is a new life.
It requires change from a person. A change in the quality of life. And the question of sacred names acquires a new meaning in this context. In fact, even in pre-Christian times a special prayer practice was connected with sacred names, the practice of continuous inner invocation of God. Praying in this way, a person actualized in himself that inner divine presence without which full communion with God is impossible. He sought closer and deeper relationships with God. But such relationships placed a certain responsibility on the seeker.
First of all in what concerns observance of the commandments. And with the coming of Christ the situation became still more tense. Now the life of the Kingdom has been opened to a person, and he can share in it through Christ. Now the breath of the Kingdom can abide in the heart of a Christian. This is far more than what a person could receive from God in pre-Christian times. But the responsibility also proves more serious. The question now concerns the purity of the Kingdom.
It is no accident that Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount insists on the unconditional obligation not only of outward observance of the commandments, but also of guarding the heart from those thoughts and intentions that can lead to their violation. Thoughts and intentions now become as important as the deeds flowing from them. Otherwise, while remaining a Christian, a person can bring into the life of the Kingdom something that cannot and must not be there, and in this way lose both the Kingdom and himself.
17 Behold, thou art called a Jew, and restest in the law, and makest thy boast of God, |
18 And knowest his will, and approvest the things that are more excellent, being instructed out of the law; |
19 And art confident that thou thyself art a guide of the blind, a light of them which are in darkness, |
20 An instructor of the foolish, a teacher of babes, which hast the form of knowledge and of the truth in the law. |
21 Thou therefore which teachest another, teachest thou not thyself? thou that preachest a man should not steal, dost thou steal? |
22 Thou that sayest a man should not commit adultery, dost thou commit adultery? thou that abhorrest idols, dost thou commit sacrilege? |
23 Thou that makest thy boast of the law, through breaking the law dishonourest thou God? |
24 For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you, as it is written. |
25 For circumcision verily profiteth, if thou keep the law: but if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision. |
26 Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision? |
27 And shall not uncircumcision which is by nature, if it fulfil the law, judge thee, who by the letter and circumcision dost transgress the law? |
28 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: |
29 But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God. |
According to the Apostle Paul, the voice of conscience resounds in every person—it is the natural moral law written in his heart, proceeding from God who created humankind. Of course, the Law given to Israel through Moses speaks more loudly, but what matters is that no one is far from the word of God. The problem is not that we do not know what is right, but that we do not follow the right path! Why? Because we are always seeking our own will rather than God’s; hence the deceitfulness and hardness of heart of which the Savior speaks.
17 Behold, thou art called a Jew, and restest in the law, and makest thy boast of God, |
18 And knowest his will, and approvest the things that are more excellent, being instructed out of the law; |
19 And art confident that thou thyself art a guide of the blind, a light of them which are in darkness, |
20 An instructor of the foolish, a teacher of babes, which hast the form of knowledge and of the truth in the law. |
21 Thou therefore which teachest another, teachest thou not thyself? thou that preachest a man should not steal, dost thou steal? |
22 Thou that sayest a man should not commit adultery, dost thou commit adultery? thou that abhorrest idols, dost thou commit sacrilege? |
23 Thou that makest thy boast of the law, through breaking the law dishonourest thou God? |
24 For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you, as it is written. |
25 For circumcision verily profiteth, if thou keep the law: but if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision. |
26 Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision? |
27 And shall not uncircumcision which is by nature, if it fulfil the law, judge thee, who by the letter and circumcision dost transgress the law? |
28 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: |
29 But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God. |
1 What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision? |
2 Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of God. |
3 For what if some did not believe? shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect? |
4 God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged. |
5 But if our unrighteousness commend the righteousness of God, what shall we say? Is God unrighteous who taketh vengeance? (I speak as a man) |
6 God forbid: for then how shall God judge the world? |
7 For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner? |
8 And not rather, (as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come? whose damnation is just. |
From following the Torah Paul moves to another theme connected with the Torah: religion and religiosity. The apostle, as we can see, understands the difference between the Torah as a properly spiritual reality and the religion it gives rise to. Judaism as a religion is indeed unthinkable without the Torah. But the Torah itself is greater than Judaism.
Moreover, observance of the religious prescriptions of Judaism does not yet guarantee what the same Jewish tradition calls "keeping the Torah": one can be a religious person and at the same time a violator of the Torah, and then religiosity in itself loses all meaning. Or one can be not religious at all, like the Gentiles, but follow the "natural" Torah, and those who follow such a "natural" Torah may turn out to be closer to God than Jews who are confident in their religious piety.
Of course, when speaking of Gentiles, Paul has in mind not worshipers of some pagan cults, but rather those whom we today would call secular people, since most of those who were called pagans in Paul's time were religiously indifferent. There were, of course, real religious pagans too, but they would hardly have been among the apostle's listeners, and certainly would not have become Christians.
What matters to Paul above all is following the inner Torah, not the external forms of the Jewish religion. He understands perfectly well, of course, that precisely the attempt to follow the inner Torah will reveal human sinfulness faster than anything else, and this process itself becomes judgment for the person. But it does not follow from this either that the Torah itself is bad, or that one needs to sin deliberately in order to reveal one's own sinfulness to the end.
The inner Torah reveals it sufficiently as it is, and to sin consciously only means increasing the measure of sinfulness in one's life. One must simply not refuse the path that presupposes following the inner Torah, even if such a path becomes judgment for the person. And in this sense Jews as the people of God have an advantage over every other people: it was precisely to the Jews as God's people that the Torah was given for reflection, understanding, and conscious following.
Without the Jewish people, there would have been not only no Judaism as a religion, but also no way of the Torah, without which full knowledge of God is impossible. And if not all Jews walk this way, the way of the Torah is a matter of a person's personal, voluntary choice. A person can be forced to fulfill religious norms and prescriptions, but he cannot be compelled to take a spiritual path, to do the spiritual work without which that path does not exist. And even if many of Paul's fellow believers turn out to be merely religious formalists, their formalism in no way devalues either the Torah or the spiritual path that it presupposes.
After registering, you can subscribe to any Bible reading plan. Personalized settings and other services for registered users are planned, so we recommend registering now. Registration is free. | ||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||