6 But of these who seemed to be somewhat, (whatsoever they were, it maketh no matter to me: God accepteth no man's person:) for they who seemed to be somewhat in conference added nothing to me:
Hide
Speaking about his apostolic ministry, Paul mentions certain well-known and worthy people who, however, demanded nothing from him besides the testimony he bore as an apostle. Apparently, in this case he is speaking of the other apostles, and above all of Peter, with whom Paul met and spoke more than once.
In this case Paul remains faithful to Christ and to his ministry: he says that with God there are no great or respected people; for Him, human respect and fame are worth nothing. At first glance this may seem strange: in every matter there are people who are more or less known, experienced, authoritative.
Such authority need not be inflated at all. But the point is that witness to Christ is not an ordinary matter. No special experience is usually required of a witness as such. What is required of him is only that he be an eyewitness of the events described, that he has seen with his own eyes what he is speaking about. The same was required of Paul, who understood this perfectly well. He knew that what he had to speak about fit into no human framework.
Of course Paul used the language and all the riches of his spiritual and religious tradition to tell about what had been revealed to him and about the One whom he had encountered on the Damascus road. But the apostle understood perfectly well that no tradition can contain this revelation whole. And if so, there can be no theology here, no doctrine, no theory at all. Of course, one can invent many theological schemes that in one way or another describe Christian revelation. And in creating them there really are people more or less experienced, more or less authoritative, more or less known.
But God does not need these schemes, and such activity has little to do with what He expects from His faithful. When it comes to witness, only one thing matters: did the witness see with his own eyes what he is speaking about? Applied to Christian witness, everything comes down to the question of whether the witness has the experience of living communion with Christ and of life with Him in His Kingdom.
Paul had such experience, and he was not chasing anything else. Judging by the fact that none of the people then authoritative in the Church demanded anything else from him, one may think that the other apostles agreed with him in this too. That is not surprising: despite all their human differences, all of them were first of all witnesses of Christ and inhabitants of the Kingdom. Everything else was secondary for them, and there was no point arguing about it.
Other notes
For Gal 2:1-10
1 Then fourteen years after I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, and took Titus with me also.
2 And I went up by revelation, and communicated unto them that gospel which I preach among the Gentiles, but privately to them which were of reputation, lest by any means I should run, or had run, in vain.
3 But neither Titus, who was with me, being a Greek, was compelled to be circumcised:
4 And that because of false brethren unawares brought in, who came in privily to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage:
5 To whom we gave place by subjection, no, not for an hour; that the truth of the gospel might continue with you.
6 But of these who seemed to be somewhat, (whatsoever they were, it maketh no matter to me: God accepteth no man's person:) for they who seemed to be somewhat in conference added nothing to me:
7 But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;
8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:)
9 And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision.
10 Only they would that we should remember the poor; the same which I also was forward to do.
Hide
As we can see, Paul did consult with the other apostles about his ministry. Judging by the fact that the question...
Read more
As we can see, Paul did consult with the other apostles about his ministry (vv. 1-2). Judging by the fact that the question concerned circumcision, Paul did bring it before the Church so that it would not bring splits and divisions into the churches (vv. 3-5). But for Paul himself this was not so much permission to preach what he preached about religion in general and circumcision in particular, as it was testimony from the Church itself, testimony that for him was as binding as any other testimony. He does not wait for any confirmation from people of the spiritual authenticity of his ministry, even if those people are the apostles themselves (v. 6). Yet the apostles, as we can see, confirmed the authenticity of Paul's ministry (vv. 7-10).
Here the apostle reveals to us a very important principle of spiritual life and spiritual ministry: its uniqueness and unrepeatability. That is why evaluating someone else's ministry is far from simple. Every revelation is always unrepeatable and fully understandable only to the one for whom it is intended. To evaluate its authenticity, one must be able to see another person's revelation through the eyes of the one to whom it was given, and that is far from easy. It is another matter when a person lives not by his own revelation but by other people's ideas and opinions, while it seems to him that those opinions are his own. There everything is much more definite. That is why Paul assesses rather sharply the attempts of the Galatian Christians to follow preachers who rely not on the experience of revelation but on their own human constructions. One must not hinder a person from doing God's work. But one can and must warn him when he tries to replace God's work with human works.