NOTES for Co1 6:1-11

Speaking about relations within the Corinthian church, Paul is surprised by the custom of Corinthian Christians suing in secular courts and choosing arbitrators not from among themselves, but from outside. Apparently, Corinth in those days was not very different from Athens or other Greek cities, whose inhabitants very often sued one another for all kinds of reasons, so that court cases, including cases involving arbitrators, were common there. Meanwhile, in the Synagogue there existed a rule, at that time still unwritten, according to which all disputes between faithful Jews, and there were no others then, had to be resolved inside their own community, either with the participation of an arbitrator or in the court of the rabbinate.

For Paul, as a Jew, it was also strange to see that matters which could perfectly well be resolved within one's own community were being taken outside by its members, who brought in both official courts and arbitrators with no relation to the church. The matter also lay in the fact that a secular court, whether official or arbitral, treated cases involving violations of commandments given by God much more leniently.

It is no accident that the apostle reminds the recipients of his letter that sinners do not inherit the Kingdom, meaning that this remains true even when a secular court does not condemn a person for violating those commandments, as often happened in pagan courts. In those times, when the Judeo-Christian tradition was dominant in the Church, a church court would surely have considered the same cases on the basis of the norms of the Torah, and the verdict of such a court could have differed noticeably from the verdict of a secular court. But that was not the only issue.

The apostle says directly: why are you suing at all? Would it not be better to leave the matter as it is, if you consider one another brothers? Indeed, brothers can "insist on their rights" and sue one another only when, in essence, they have already stopped being brothers. And Paul points to the many lawsuits among members of the Corinthian church as an obvious sign of spiritual trouble in the church community: if everything in this respect had been normal in the church of Corinth, then lawsuits of this kind would either not have existed at all, or would have been very few, and all matters would have been resolved within the community.

One wonders whether the Apostle Paul is afraid of airing dirty laundry in public. Why must believers not take their cases before unbelievers? Paul says that the very existence of quarrels between brothers is already fundamentally wrong. But if two believers lacked the patience and humility to resolve their conflicts themselves, it is wiser to seek counsel from members of their own community. Why? Merely because it is shameful? This matters too, I think: the conduct of Christians is, after all, a kind of testimony about the Church. But there is another point, probably more important. From what perspective is the matter considered? What comes first? Only a believer will set as a goal the attempt to see the problem from God’s point of view. That is why Paul calls believers to turn to their brothers for counsel.

Behind these words lies the great mystery of righteousness. If you are a disciple of the Crucified One, then it follows that it is proper to you, like a sheep, to be led to slaughter. And it is entirely improper to defend your rights in any court whatever. Someone is always taking something from us; someone is always to blame; someone has always offended us. The wisdom of Jesus' disciples is that either we ourselves try to stand up for ourselves, or we remain wronged and God stands up for us. And here, alas, compromise is impossible, when we trust in God but also ourselves seek a little help from the "strongmen of this world." Evil can be resisted only as the Teacher resisted it: by dying together with Him.